Public Investment Involving Laws in Improvement
When it comes to improvement, there is public.icon public investment involving laws. It's difficult, but due to the issue of 時間軸の問題 (timeline problem), it would be beneficial to allocate funds beforehand (expanding the budget range). However, there are certain types of public goods that cannot be compensated for by this "Retroactive Futarchy" system. These are the Public Investment Involving Laws in Improvement. If they are to be used by local governments, public goods that require permission or privileges when creating new public benefits cannot be handled. Legislative action must be taken. On the other hand, this applies not only to local governments but also to Futarchy on Optimism. When wanting to engage in "public investment involving laws," it is possible to allocate funds to activities that "unravel the barriers posed by laws and international regulatory frameworks." Whether this is possible or not depends on the sense of the members of the Results Oracle.
This approach is only applicable to "initiatives that have initial costs but generate a certain level of profitability."
Lastly, the issue of "how Futarchy can maintain public goods that require continuous financial support to ensure independence and quality at a certain level" seems to be an unresolved problem. For example, judges ensure their independence through stable treatment and a managed living environment. The issue also applies to financially unprofitable infrastructure companies.